Détournement, Decolonization, and the American Indian Occupation of Alcatraz Island (1969–1971)

Casey R. Kelly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    On November 20, 1969, eighty-nine American Indians calling themselves the “Indians of All Tribes” (IOAT) invaded Alcatraz Island. The group’s founding proclamation was addressed to “the Great White Father and All His People,” and declared “We, the Native Americans, reclaim the land known as Alcatraz Island in the name of all American Indians by right of discovery” (2). Tongue-in-cheek, the IOAT offered to purchase Alcatraz Island for “twenty-four dollars in glass beads and red clothe.” In this essay, I illustrate how the IOAT engaged in a rhetoric of détournement, or a subversive misappropriation of dominant discourse that disassembles and imitates texts until they clearly display their oppressive qualities. I argue that the Proclamation established a textual framework that calls for a skeptical and irreverent reading of dominant discourse. I conclude that strategic détournements suture dominant discourses to the moniker of colonialism and invite sympathetic audiences to engage in decolonization.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalScholarship and Professional Work - Communication
    Volume44
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

    Keywords

    • Alcatraz Island occupation
    • Indians of All Tribes
    • decolonization
    • rhetoric of détournement
    • rhetorical studies

    Disciplines

    • Communication
    • Critical and Cultural Studies
    • Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication
    • Social Influence and Political Communication
    • Speech and Rhetorical Studies

    Cite this