Facing the Fear: A Free Market Approach for Economic Expression

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Commentators differ on whether a diminished constitutional status for profit-driven speech is consistent with free speech theory. Most recently, the Supreme Court of the United States in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission largely embraced an unfettered marketplace approach for political speech financed by corporate treasuries. Given the harm a free market approach is said to have produced in the economic realm, is this approach useful for structuring the constitutional protection economic expression receives? This article discusses the placement of economic expression within First Amendment theory and contends that restrictions on economic speech should be aimed at combating deceptive economic activities while overall regulatory goals should focus on requirements that enrich the supply of accurate and timely information.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalScholarship and Professional Work - Communication
    Volume17
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

    Keywords

    • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    • free speech theory
    • profit-driven speech

    Disciplines

    • Communication
    • Communications Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Mass Communication

    Cite this