TY - JOUR
T1 - Nasal Batten Grafts: Are Patients Satisfied?
AU - Sufyan, Ahmed
AU - Ziebarth, Michelle
AU - Crousore, Nancy
AU - Bergeson, Tonya
AU - Kokoska, Mimi S.
AU - Bergeson-Dana, Tonya
N1 - Objectives To learn how nasal batten grafts affect patients' assessment of their nasal airway patency and to determine the extent to which patients believe batten grafts altered their appearance.Methods A prospective survey study of 18 patients in a tertiary veterans hospital who had nasal airway...
Sufyan, A., Ziebarth, M., Crousore, N., Bergeson, T. R., & Kokoska, M. S. (2012). Nasal Batten Grafts: Are Patients Satisfied?, Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 14 (1), 14-19.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Objectives: To learn how nasal batten grafts affect patients’ assessment of their nasal airway patency and to determine the extent to which patients believe batten grafts altered their appearance. Methods: A prospective survey study of 18 patients in a tertiary veterans hospital who had nasal airway obstruction (NAO) due to nasal valve collapse was completed. Patients had placement of bilateral polyethylene batten grafts during a 36-month study period. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) validated survey was used to measure a patient’s subjective postoperative change in nasal airway obstruction. In addition, the patients were asked to rate the extent their appearance had changed. Results: All patients presented with complaints of NAO due to nasal valve collapse either in isolation or in combination with another anatomical source of obstruction. The nasal valve collapse was identified by clinical examination. All patients had preoperative photographs. Most patients had a trial with an intranasal stent before opting for surgical implantation of the batten grafts. The results of the NOSE survey demonstrate significant improvement in nasal obstruction. Patients also reported only a minimal change in appearance. There was 1 patient with implant extrusions and only a few implants were removed. Conclusions: Nasal airway obstruction due to nasal valve collapse can be effectively treated with polyethylene batten grafts. The implants are well tolerated, and patients report a significant improvement in NAO. There is little risk of implant extrusion, exposure, or intolerance. In addition, patients did not note a significant change to their appearance.
AB - Objectives: To learn how nasal batten grafts affect patients’ assessment of their nasal airway patency and to determine the extent to which patients believe batten grafts altered their appearance. Methods: A prospective survey study of 18 patients in a tertiary veterans hospital who had nasal airway obstruction (NAO) due to nasal valve collapse was completed. Patients had placement of bilateral polyethylene batten grafts during a 36-month study period. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) validated survey was used to measure a patient’s subjective postoperative change in nasal airway obstruction. In addition, the patients were asked to rate the extent their appearance had changed. Results: All patients presented with complaints of NAO due to nasal valve collapse either in isolation or in combination with another anatomical source of obstruction. The nasal valve collapse was identified by clinical examination. All patients had preoperative photographs. Most patients had a trial with an intranasal stent before opting for surgical implantation of the batten grafts. The results of the NOSE survey demonstrate significant improvement in nasal obstruction. Patients also reported only a minimal change in appearance. There was 1 patient with implant extrusions and only a few implants were removed. Conclusions: Nasal airway obstruction due to nasal valve collapse can be effectively treated with polyethylene batten grafts. The implants are well tolerated, and patients report a significant improvement in NAO. There is little risk of implant extrusion, exposure, or intolerance. In addition, patients did not note a significant change to their appearance.
UR - http://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.1187
U2 - 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1187
DO - 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1187
M3 - Article
SN - 2168-6076
VL - 14
JO - Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
JF - Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
IS - 4
ER -