The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged with Apportioning Damages in Modified Comparative Fault Cases: An Empirical Study of the Alternatives

Jordan H. Leibman; Robert B. Bennett; Richard Fetter

doi:10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.x

The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged with Apportioning Damages in Modified Comparative Fault Cases: An Empirical Study of the Alternatives

Jordan H. Leibman
, Robert B. Bennett
, Richard Fetter

Indiana University
Butler University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Focuses on a study on the effect of lifting the blindfold from civil juries charged with apportioning damages in modified comparative fault cases. Historical background on comparative fault in the United States; Origin of blindfolding; Comparison of blindfold modified comparative fault verdicts with sunshine verdicts; Conclusions.

Original language	American English
Journal	Scholarship and Professional Work - Business
Volume	35
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.x
State	Published - Jan 1 1998

Keywords

Jury
civil law
verdicts

Disciplines

Civil Law
Civil Procedure
Law

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.xLicense: Unspecified

The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged witFinal published version, 635 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{8ac0ad07b0b44a3c806063f0b47bea09,

title = "The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged with Apportioning Damages in Modified Comparative Fault Cases: An Empirical Study of the Alternatives",

abstract = " Focuses on a study on the effect of lifting the blindfold from civil juries charged with apportioning damages in modified comparative fault cases. Historical background on comparative fault in the United States; Origin of blindfolding; Comparison of blindfold modified comparative fault verdicts with sunshine verdicts; Conclusions.",

keywords = "Jury, civil law, verdicts",

author = "Leibman, \{Jordan H.\} and Bennett, \{Robert B.\} and Richard Fetter",

year = "1998",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.x",

language = "American English",

volume = "35",

journal = "Scholarship and Professional Work - Business",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged with Apportioning Damages in Modified Comparative Fault Cases: An Empirical Study of the Alternatives

AU - Leibman, Jordan H.

AU - Bennett, Robert B.

AU - Fetter, Richard

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Focuses on a study on the effect of lifting the blindfold from civil juries charged with apportioning damages in modified comparative fault cases. Historical background on comparative fault in the United States; Origin of blindfolding; Comparison of blindfold modified comparative fault verdicts with sunshine verdicts; Conclusions.

AB - Focuses on a study on the effect of lifting the blindfold from civil juries charged with apportioning damages in modified comparative fault cases. Historical background on comparative fault in the United States; Origin of blindfolding; Comparison of blindfold modified comparative fault verdicts with sunshine verdicts; Conclusions.

KW - Jury

KW - civil law

KW - verdicts

UR - https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cob_papers/155

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01009.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

JO - Scholarship and Professional Work - Business

JF - Scholarship and Professional Work - Business

IS - 3

ER -

The Effect of Lifting the Blindfold From Civil Juries Charged with Apportioning Damages in Modified Comparative Fault Cases: An Empirical Study of the Alternatives

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this